danigm.net - gsoc

GNOME Tour in openSUSE and welcome app

danigm — Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:00:00 +0200

As a follow up of the Hackweek 24 project, I've continued working on the gnome-tour fork for openSUSE with custom pages to replace the welcome application for openSUSE distributions.

GNOME Tour modifications

All the modifications are on top of upstream gnome-tour and stored in the openSUSE/gnome-tour repo

Custom initial page

A new donations page. In openSUSE we remove the popup from GNOME shell for donations, so it's fair to add it in this place.

Last page with custom openSUSE links, this one is the used for opensuse-welcome app.

opensuse-welcome package

The original opensuse-welcome is a qt application, and this one is used for all desktop environments, but it's more or less unmaintained and looking for a replacement, we can use the gnome-tour fork as the default welcome app for all desktop without a custom app.

To do a minimal desktop agnostic opensuse-welcome application, I've modified the gnome-tour to also generate a second binary but just with the last page.

The new opensuse-welcome rpm package is built as a subpackage of gnome-tour. This new application is minimal and it doesn't have lots of requirements, but as it's a gtk4 application, it requires gtk and libadwaita, and also depends on gnome-tour-data to get the resoures of the app.

To improve this welcome app we need to review the translations, because I added three new pages to the gnome-tour and that specific pages are not translated, so I should regenerate the .po files for all languages and upload to openSUSE Weblate for translations.

Log Detective: GSoC 2025 (part 2)

danigm — Wed, 27 Aug 2025 07:00:00 +0200

This week is the last week of Google Summer of Code for this year edition, and I'll do a summary of what we have been doing and future plans for the Log Detective integration in openSUSE.

I wrote a blog post about this project when it starts, so if you didn't read, you can take a look.

All the work and code was done in the logdetective-obs github repository.

Aazam, aka the intern, also wrote some blog post about his work.

Initial Research

The idea of the project was to explore ways of integration of LogDetective with the openSUSE dev workflow. So we started collecting some build failures in the openSUSE build service and testing with log detective to check if the output is smart or even relevant.

The intern creates a script to collect log from build failures and we store the LLM answer.

Doing this we detected that the log-detective.com explain is very slow and the local tool is less accurate.

The results that we got weren't too good, but at this point of the project is something expected. The model is being trained and will improve with every new log that users send.

Local vs Remote, model comparison

The logdetective command line tool is nice, but LLM requires a lot of resources to run locally. This tool also uses the models published by fedora in huggingface.co, so it's not as accurate as the remote instance that has a better trained model and is up to date.

In any case, the local logdetective tool is interesting and, at this moment, it's faster than the deployed log-detective.com.

Using this tool, Aazam did some research, comparing the output with different models.

logdetective apache-arrow_standard_x86_64.log\
  --model unsloth/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-128K-GGUF\
  -F Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf\
  --prompt ~/prompt.yaml

So using other specific models, the logdetective tool can return better results.

The plugin

openSUSE packagers uses the osc tool, to build packages in build.opensuse.org. This tool can be extended with plugins and we created a new plugin to use log-detective.

So a packager can get some AI explanation about a build failure with a simple command:

$ osc ld -r -p devel:languages:python --package python-pygame --repo openSUSE_Tumbleweed
🔍 Running logdetective for python-pygame (openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64)...
Log url: https://api.opensuse.org/public/build/devel:languages:python/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64/python-pygame/_log
🌐 Sending log to LogDetective API...
 The RPM build process for the `python-pygame` package failed during the
`%check` phase, as indicated by the "Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-
tmp.hiddzT (%check)" log snippet. This failure occurred due to seven test
failures, one error, and six skipped steps in the test suite of the package.



The primary issue causing the build failure seems to be the traceback error in
the `surface_test.py` file, which can be seen in the following log snippets:



[[  278s] Traceback (most recent call last):
[  278s]   File "/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/python-
pygame-2.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-
packages/pygame/tests/surface_test.py", line 284, in test_copy_rle
]
[[  278s] Traceback (most recent call last):
[  278s]   File "/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/python-
pygame-2.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-
packages/pygame/tests/surface_test.py", line 274, in
test_mustlock_surf_alpha_rle
]
[[  278s] Traceback (most recent call last):
[  278s]   File "/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/python-
pygame-2.6.1-build/BUILDROOT/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-
packages/pygame/tests/surface_test.py", line 342, in test_solarwolf_rle_usage
]



These traceback errors suggest that there are issues with the test functions
`test_copy_rle`, `test_mustlock_surf_alpha_rle`, and `test_solarwolf_rle_usage`
in the `surface_test.py` file. To resolve this issue, you should:



1. Identify the root cause of the traceback errors in each of the functions.
2. Fix the issues found, either by modifying the test functions or correcting
the underlying problem they are testing for.
3. Re-build the RPM package with the updated `surface_test.py` file.



It's also recommended to review the other test failures and skipped steps, as
they might indicate other issues with the package or its dependencies that
should be addressed.

Or if we are building locally, it's possible to run using the installed logdetective command line. But this method is less accurate, because the model used is not smart enough, yet:

$ osc build
[...]
$ osc ld --local-log --repo openSUSE_Tumbleweed
Found local build log: /var/tmp/build-root/openSUSE_Tumbleweed-x86_64/.build.log
🚀 Analyzing local build log: /tmp/tmpuu1sg1q0
INFO:logdetective:Loading model from fedora-copr/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3-GGUF
...

Future plans

Adding submit-log functionality to osc-ld-plugin. In-progress. This will make it easier to collaborate with log-detective.com, allowing openSUSE packagers to send new data for model training.
Gitea bot. openSUSE development workflow is moving to git, so we can create a bot that comment on Pull Request with packages that fails to build. Something similar to what fedora people have for centos gitlab
Add a new tab to log-detective.com website to submit logs directly from OBS

This was an interesting Summer of Code project. I learned a bit about LLM. I think that this project has a lot of potential, this can be integrated in different workflows and an expert LLM can be a great tool to help packagers, summarizing big logs, tagging similar failures, etc.

We have a lot of packages and a lot of data in OBS, so we should start to feed the LLM with this data, and in combination with the fedora project, the log-detective could be a real expert in open source RPM packaging.

Log Detective: Google Summer of Code 2025

danigm — Mon, 09 Jun 2025 12:00:00 +0200

I'm glad to say that I'll participate again in the GSoC, as mentor. This year we will try to improve the RPM packaging workflow using AI, as part of the openSUSE project.

So this summer I'll be mentoring an intern that will research how to integrate Log Detective with openSUSE tooling to improve the packager workflow to maintain rpm packages.

Log Detective

Log Detective is an initiative created by the Fedora project, with the goal of

"Train an AI model to understand RPM build logs and explain the failure in simple words, with recommendations how to fix it. You won't need to open the logs at all."

As a project that was promoted by Fedora, it's highly integrated with the build tools around this distribution and RPM packages. But RPM packages are used in a lot of different distributions, so this "expert" LLM will be helpful for everyone doing RPM, and everyone doing RPM, should contribute to it.

This is open source, so if, at openSUSE, we want to have something similar to improve the OBS, we don't need to reimplement it, we can collaborate. And that's the idea of this GSoC project.

We want to use Log Detective, but also collaborate with failures from openSUSE to improve the training and the AI, and this should benefit openSUSE but also will benefit Fedora and all other RPM based distributions.

The intern

The selected intern is Aazam Thakur. He studies at University of Mumbai, India. He has experience in using SUSE as he has previously worked on SLES 15.6 during his previous summer mentorship at OpenMainFrame Project for RPM packaging.

I'm sure that he will be able to achieve great things during these three months. The project looks very promising and it's one of the things where AI and LLM will shine, because digging into logs is always something difficult and if we train a LLM with a lot of data it can be really useful to categorize failures and give a short description of what's happening.

rpmlint: Google Summer of Code 2024

danigm — Thu, 30 May 2024 00:00:00 +0200

I'm glad to say that I'll participate again in the GSoC, as mentor. This year we will continue the work done during the past year, as part of the openSUSE project.

So this summer I'll be mentoring an intern and we'll continue working on improving the testing framework of the rpmlint project.

This year we've a better testing framework, thanks to the work done during the past Summer of Code, by Afrid. So the goal for this year is to try to modernize existing tests and remove as much files as possible from test/binary directory, replacing those with mock packages defined with python code.

The selected intern is Luz Marina Montilla Marín. She has done some initial work in the rpmlint project, creating the mock packages for some tests and we've just started with the work to do during the GSoC program, evaluating the tests that we've right now and planning were to start.

She studies at Córdoba, Spain, my hometown. Every year I try to reach young people at different local universities, here in Andalucía, and sometimes I'm able to convince some students to participate, like the GSoC 2020, when Alejandro Dominguez, from Seville, were working on Fractal. So I'm happy that I'm increasing the number of free software developers in my local community :D

I'm sure that she will be able to achieve great things during these three months, so I'm looking forward to start to code and see how far can we go.

rpmlint updates (August 2023)

danigm — Wed, 30 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0200

We are at the end of the summer and this means that this year Google Summer of code is ending.

The recent changes applied now in the main branch include:

Remove usage of pkg_resource because it's deprecated.
Fix elf binary check with ELF files with a prefix.
New check for python packages with multiple .pyc files for different python versions.
Improve the testing framework (merged the work done during the GSoC 2023)

Summer of Code 2023 updates

The summer of code is ending and the work done by Afrid was good enough to be merged, so I merged it the past week.

I'm really happy with the work done during the GSoC program, now we've a more simple way to define tests for rpmlint checks mocking the rpm, so it's not always needed to build a fake rpm binary for each new test. This will make a lot easier to create simple tests, so I hope that we can increase the code coverage using this new framework.

During this time Afrid has extended the FakePkg class, so it's possible now to define fake metadata and files with fake tags and attributes. It's not complete and it's not a simple task to replace all the rpm binaries used for tests, because the Pkg class and RPM tags is a complex thing, but the current state allow us to replace a lot of them. Afrid has replaced some of the tests that uses binaries, but in the following months we can continue working on this and replace more.

After this work, we can now start to use more the FakePkg class in tests, so another task that we can do is to provide some common fake pkgs to use in different tests and new checks, so now it's possible to create fake packages with dynamic random data, so we can extend tests with fuzz testing and maybe this will help to improve the tool reliability.

Conclusion

I've participated as mentor several times now in the summer of code, and outreachy, and almost always was a good experience. With the gnome foundation in previous programs and this year with opensuse. These two communities are very open to collaboration and makes the whole process really simple, for me as mentor, and also for the intern.

I want to congratulate Afrid, because it was nice to work with him during this summer, he has done a great work, not just technically, but communicating, asking and finding his own solutions without requiring a continuous guidance.

He is very passionate and looks like a nice person, so I hope that he will continue around the open source, it could be opensuse, rpmlint or any other community, but this kind of people is what you want to find in any community.

After many years collaborating with different free software communities, it's amazing that there are so many great people in every project, of course you can find toxic communities and people, but in my experience, that's usually just noise, there are a lot of nice people out there, doing a great work, and I'm happy that young people like Afrid can be part of the free software movement, because this is what makes the free software great, the people that is working on it.

So Thanks a lot to Google for another summer of code, thanks to SUSE for letting me, and encourage me, to mentor, and thanks to all the free software developers that are out there.

I encourage everyone to participate in this kind of programs, for interns, it's a good opportunity to learn and to make some money working on free software, for mentors it's an opportunity to get some help in your project and help newcomers to be part of the community.

Have a lot of fun!

rpmlint updates (July 2023)

danigm — Thu, 06 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0200

I'm spending some time every week working in the rpmlint project. The tool is very stable and the functionality is well defined, implemented and tested, so there's no crazy development or a lot of new functionalities, but as in all the software, there are always bugs to solve and things to improve.

The recent changes applied now in the main branch include:

Update the usage of rpm to not use old API.
Fixes for rpmdiff -v, check for NULL char, special macros in comments and spell checking of description in different languages.
Move all the metadata from setup.py to pyproject.toml.
Releasing rpmlint as pre-commit hook
Improvements to the PythonCheck in the dependency checking.

Summer of Code 2023 updates

The first month of the Summer of Code has passed and Afrid is doing a great job there. We've now a draft Pull Request with some initial changes that allow us to mock rpm packages in tests so it's easier to create new tests without the need of creating a binary package.

The first step done was to extend the existing FakePkg class to allow us to define package files and some package metadata.

Now he's working in replacing all of the test_python.py tests that uses binaries rpm to something that doesn't needed.

The idea is to replace as much tests as possible to reduce the number of rpm binaries and after that, provide helper functions, decorators and classes to make it easy to write tests, writing less code.

Roadmap

In any software project there's always room for improvements, fixes and enhancements. If the project is there for enough time, it's even more critical to modernize the code to reduce the technical debt.

My plan for 2023 is to improve the tests around rpmlint as much as possible. First with the GSoC project, making it easier to write more tests, improving the testing tools that we've. And after the summer, improving the test coverage.

There's also a tool that shares some of the ideas with rpmlint, spec-cleaner, it's also written in Python, so the next step, after the tests improvements will be to take a deep look into the code of these two tools and try to integrate in some way. Maybe it's possible to refactor the common code into an external module, maybe we can bring some ideas from spec-cleaner to rpmlint. Not sure yet, but that'll be my next step.

Don't forget that this is free software, so you can participate too! If you find any issue in rpmlint or have an idea to improve it, don't hesitate and create a new issue.

rpmlint: Google Summer of Code 2023

danigm — Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0200

I'm glad to say that I'll participate again in the GSoC, as mentor. This year will be a bit different from the previous ones, because I'm not mentoring a GNOME project but a openSUSE project.

I started to work at SUSE the past year and with this new job I get involved in the openSUSE community and I started to contribute to rpmlint.

So this summer I'll be mentoring an intern and we'll work on improving the testing framework of the rpmlint project.

The rpmlint project is a command line tool to check rpm packages, the correctness of these kind of packages and warn the packagers about usual problems or good practices. It's widely used in all Linux distributions based on rpm, mainly SUSE and RedHat.

It is written in Python and uses pytest for testing the code. Right now there are a lot of .rpm binary packages, to check different functionality, but that way of testing makes a bit hard to write new tests and to maintain with changes. The idea of this GSoC project is to extend the testing framework of rpmlint to support an easy way of writting tests that doesn't require a real rpm, something that can mock what it's in the .rpm binary and try to replace some of the current binary tests with this new mock.

The selected intern is Afrid Hussain. He has done some initial work in the rpmlint project, solving some minor issues and we're now preparing the work to be done during the GSoC program. I'm sure that he will be able to achieve great things during these three months, so I'm looking forward to start to code and see how far can we go.

Fractal: Refactoring and the review process

danigm — Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0200

In this year GSoC, Alejandro is working on Fractal, moving code from the backend to the client, to try to simplify the code used to communicate with the matrix.org server and maybe in the future we can replace fractal-matrix-api with the matrix-rust-sdk. And then we'll have less code in our project to maintain.

This is a great work, something needed in a project with a technological debt of several years. I created this project to learn Rust, and also I was learning about the matrix protocol during the project build. And other contributors do the same. So we've been building one thing on top another for a lot of years.

In this kind of community driven projects it's the way to go. For some time we've people interested and developers think about the design and start change some parts or to write new functionality following a new design pattern. But voluntary developers motivation change in time and they left the project and the next one continues the work with a different vision.

It's not something bad, it's the greatness of the open source. Different people has different motivations to participate in a free software project, and every contribution is welcome. I'm the maintainer of the project and I've spent a lot of time building Fractal, but I don't have the same motivation now to work on the project, to it's good to have other people working on it so it can continue alive.

Alejandro is doing a great work and he's not a 4 months contributor. He's working on the backend refactoring for 2 years now, step by step and he has plans for the future.

Refactoring a big project is always hard, because there's a lot of code movement and always there's the fear to regressions.

Rust is a great language and it shines when big code refactoring comes to the scene. If it compiles, you know that there's no memory errors, dangling pointers and that kind of problems. If it builds it will work.

But maybe it will work different, so the review process is needed to ensure that the application continues working.

Automated tests are really useful for big code changes and project refactoring, because you have a quick picture and some certainty that the project is working. But we don't have tests in fractal :D, so someone should do that.

So here I am. Reviewing large MR, with a lot of lines. At least gitlab makes this process a bit easier.

What I'm trying to do in the review process is to just read the whole diff and check if there's some problem in the code. And after every change, I run the app and I do some tests, trying to use the functionality that could be broken by those new changes.

This takes a lot of time and it's not something fun to do... But someone has to do that. And during that process, sometimes I learn something new. Reading code is an interesting task and try to find bugs in code while reading it, is something useful. To think about that code, what it does and why.

Fractal: Google Summer of Code 2020

danigm — Fri, 08 May 2020 00:00:00 +0200

I'm glad to say that I'll participate again in the GSoC, as mentor. This summer we'll try to implement multi-account support in Fractal.

The selected student is Alejandro Dominguez (aledomu), that is collaborating with Fractal since the Seville Hackfest in December 2018, doing a great work in the backend. Alejandro is young developer with a lot of energy and ideas, so it's great to have this kind of people working on GNOME.

I've not spend much time lately developing Fractal, the time and energy is limited, but I'll try to use this GSoC mentorship to go back to the active Fractal development. My objective during this summer will be to stabilize, fix bugs and improve the performance and create a new release at the end of the GSoC, because we've a lot of new functionality in master, but I didn't spend the time to do the release.

The google summer of code is a great opportunity for free software, it give us a full time working student, during three months, working on free software, so it's really appreciated in a community where a lot of work is volunteer work.

There are a total of 14 projects selected for this GSoC round for gnome, you can take a look to the full list in the GSoC page.